Integrating Thermal Driving and Surface Wettability in Thermally Driven Carbon-Membrane Desalination: Design Trade-offs and Operational Evidence

Authors

  • Dawson Benson Author
  • Emmett Norton Author
  • Finn Walsh Author

Keywords:

Thermally Driven Carbon-Membrane Desalination, Thermal Driving, Surface Wettability, Pore Architecture, Selectivity, Membrane Fabrication

Abstract

This review examines a shared methodological problem in thermally driven carbon-membrane desalination: how evidence from coupling a temperature gradient with graphene-channel surface wettability can be placed in analytical dialogue with a monolayer array of carbon nanotubes as nanoscale transport pores without erasing differences in scale, assumptions, or intended use. A structured reading of two target studies and 12 verified companion references is conducted across five lenses: thermal driving, surface wettability, pore architecture, selectivity, membrane fabrication. Emphasis is placed on the provenance of evidence, the comparability of baselines, and the consequences of alternative explanations. Comparison reveals recurring trade-offs among thermal driving, surface wettability, and pore architecture. These trade-offs do not support a universal ranking; instead, they identify the operating envelope within which each method remains credible and the perturbations most likely to expose fragile conclusions. On this basis, the review proposes an auditable pathway from focal mechanism to application claim, with explicit checkpoints for calibration, external validity, and responsible interpretation.

Archive transfer

Originally published in Inclusive Growth and Management Quarterly (NB), article 147, on 2026-08-31. Transferred to Studies in Science and Discovery on 3 November 2026. The original authors, publication date and article text are retained.

References

  1. Wang, T., Pei, J., & Jiang, H. (2024). Desalination Driven by Temperature Gradient Coupled with Surface Wettability in a Graphene Channel. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 63(49), 21565-21571.
  2. Wang, T., Jiang, H., Shao, X., Pei, J., Zheng, H., & Hu, X. (2021). Carbon nanotube arrays as monolayer nanoscale membrane for enhanced desalination. Desalination and Water Treatment, 234, 333-347.
  3. Fan, X., Liu, Y., & Quan, X. (2019). A novel reduced graphene oxide/carbon nanotube hollow fiber membrane with high forward osmosis performance. Desalination, 451, 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.07.020
  4. Kim, Y. M., Ebro, H., & Kim, J. H. (2016). Molecular dynamics simulation of seawater reverse osmosis desalination using carbon nanotube membranes. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(43), 20169-20176. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1112982
  5. Altaee, A., Zaragoza, G., & van Tonningen, H. R. (2014). Comparison between Forward Osmosis-Reverse Osmosis and Reverse Osmosis processes for seawater desalination. Desalination, 336, 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.01.002
  6. Wan Azelee, I., Goh, P. S., Lau, W. J., & Ismail, A. F. (2018). Facile acid treatment of multiwalled carbon nanotube-titania nanotube thin film nanocomposite membrane for reverse osmosis desalination. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 517-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.212
  7. Shi, Q., Gao, H., Zhang, Y., Meng, Z., Rao, D., Su, J., et al. (2018). Bilayer graphene with ripples for reverse osmosis desalination. Carbon, 136, 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.053
  8. Jasim, H. K., Al-Ridah, Z. A., & Naje, A. S. (2024). Graphene oxide–carbon nanotube composite membrane for enhanced removal of organic pollutants by forward osmosis. Desalination and Water Treatment, 318, 100363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100363
  9. Vatanpour, V., & Sanadgol, A. (2020). Surface modification of reverse osmosis membranes by grafting of polyamidoamine dendrimer containing graphene oxide nanosheets for desalination improvement. Desalination, 491, 114442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114442
  10. Kashif, M., Sabri, M. A., Zhang, N., & Banat, F. (2024). Graphene: A diamond hammer for cracking hard nuts in reverse osmosis desalination membranes. Desalination, 581, 117552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.117552
  11. Cohen-Tanugi, D., & Grossman, J. C. (2015). Nanoporous graphene as a reverse osmosis membrane: Recent insights from theory and simulation. Desalination, 366, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.12.046
  12. Park, J., Choi, W., Kim, S. H., Chun, B. H., Bang, J., & Lee, K. B. (2010). Enhancement of Chlorine Resistance in Carbon Nanotube Based Nanocomposite Reverse Osmosis Membranes. Desalination and Water Treatment, 15(1-3), 198-204. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2010.1686
  13. Binger, Z. M., & Achilli, A. (2020). Forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis process modeling for integration with seawater reverse osmosis desalination. Desalination, 491, 114583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114583
  14. Mahdavi, H., & Rahimi, A. (2018). Zwitterion functionalized graphene oxide/polyamide thin film nanocomposite membrane: Towards improved anti-fouling performance for reverse osmosis. Desalination, 433, 94-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.01.031

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

Issue

2026: Transferred NB archive: original Vol. 4, No. 3

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Dawson Benson, Emmett Norton, Finn Walsh (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.