One Traffic Hour Can Carry Several Weather Records

Authors

  • Arthur Douglas Author
  • Arthur Hayes Author
  • Vincent Brooks Author

Abstract

The question concerns unique-hour traffic association after duplicate weather collapse. The secondary ordinary least squares analysis contains 40,564 observations and uses cluster covariance. The coefficient on temp_c is 0.0029, with a 95 percent interval from 0.0020 to 0.0039. Collapsing weather descriptions protects the information unit of one measured traffic hour. An apparent row-count gain from duplicated hours would exaggerate independent evidence. Service allocation and staffing can use demand as an input, but a traffic association cannot replace their own service mechanisms or show the consequence of a staffing action. The estimates describe the released collection and its conditioning set. No new data collection, simulator experiment, or deployment-policy evaluation is claimed.

References

  1. W. Chen, S. Gao, W. Chen, and J. Du, “Optimizing Service System Resource Allocations with Probabilistic Measures: A Simulation Optimization Perspective,” Production and Operations Management, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 65–81, 2023.
  2. H. Guo, S. Gao, K. L. Tsui, and T. Niu, “Simulation Optimization for Medical Staff Configuration at Emergency Department in Hong Kong,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1655–1665, 2017.
  3. John Hogue. Metro Interstate Traffic Volume. UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2019. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.24432/C5X60B.
  4. White, Halbert. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica, vol. 48, no. 4, 1980, pp. 817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934.
  5. Cameron, A. Colin, and Douglas L. Miller. “A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference.” Journal of Human Resources, vol. 50, no. 2, 2015, pp. 317–372. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317.
  6. Rasmussen, Carl Edward, and Christopher K. I. Williams. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. MIT Press, 2006. https://gaussianprocess.org/gpml/.
  7. Ankenman, Bruce, Barry L. Nelson, and Jeremy Staum. “Stochastic Kriging for Simulation Metamodeling.” Operations Research, vol. 58, no. 2, 2010, pp. 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1090.0754.
  8. Kim, Seong-Hee, and Barry L. Nelson. “A Fully Sequential Procedure for Indifference-Zone Selection in Simulation.” ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, vol. 11, no. 3, 2001, pp. 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1145/502109.502111.
  9. Frazier, Peter I., Warren B. Powell, and Savas Dayanik. “A Knowledge-Gradient Policy for Sequential Information Collection.” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 47, no. 5, 2008, pp. 2410–2439. https://doi.org/10.1137/070693424.
  10. Bertsimas, Dimitris, and Melvyn Sim. “The Price of Robustness.” Operations Research, vol. 52, no. 1, 2004, pp. 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1030.0065.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-02