Historical Fit and the Next Year of Operating Demand

Authors

  • Trevor Mason Author
  • Jordan Stone Author
  • Austin Barnes Author

Abstract

A historical model can fit observed outcomes well and still fail when the operating year changes. This article uses a chronological split of daily bicycle demand to examine that discrepancy with ordinary least squares. A model estimated on 2011 records is evaluated on 2012 records, while a pooled specification estimates an adjusted year association. The resulting forecast bias motivates a synthesis of finite-budget selection, offline evidence preparation, robustness, and model adaptation. The article distinguishes uncertainty that can shrink through additional computation from discrepancies caused by a changing input environment. It offers a transparent benchmark for that distinction without claiming that the year association identifies an intervention.

References

  1. Y. Li and S. Gao, “Convergence Rate Analysis for Optimal Computing Budget Allocation Algorithms,” Automatica, vol. 153, 111042, 2023.
  2. S. Gao, C. Li, and J. Du, “Rate Analysis for Offline Simulation Online Application,” Proceedings of the 2019 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 3468–3479, 2019.
  3. Fanaee-T, Hadi. Bike Sharing. UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2013. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.24432/C5W894.
  4. White, Halbert. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica, vol. 48, no. 4, 1980, pp. 817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934.
  5. Newey, Whitney K., and Kenneth D. West. “A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix.” Econometrica, vol. 55, no. 3, 1987, pp. 703–708. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913610.
  6. Cameron, A. Colin, and Douglas L. Miller. “A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference.” Journal of Human Resources, vol. 50, no. 2, 2015, pp. 317–372. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317.
  7. Ankenman, Bruce, Barry L. Nelson, and Jeremy Staum. “Stochastic Kriging for Simulation Metamodeling.” Operations Research, vol. 58, no. 2, 2010, pp. 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1090.0754.
  8. Rasmussen, Carl Edward, and Christopher K. I. Williams. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. MIT Press, 2006. https://gaussianprocess.org/gpml/.
  9. Frazier, Peter I., Warren B. Powell, and Savas Dayanik. “A Knowledge-Gradient Policy for Sequential Information Collection.” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 47, no. 5, 2008, pp. 2410–2439. https://doi.org/10.1137/070693424.
  10. Bertsimas, Dimitris, and Melvyn Sim. “The Price of Robustness.” Operations Research, vol. 52, no. 1, 2004, pp. 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1030.0065.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-29

Issue

Section

Articles